Quantcast
breaking news

Big Ten Releases Sanctions Against Penn State

By: Brian Thompson
Updated: July 24, 2012
watch video

The Big Ten announced additional sanctions against Penn State Monday in addition to the NCAA sanctions.  They issued the following statement:


"We must begin first and foremost, by again expressing our great sorrow for all of those whose lives have been so grievously harmed by the series of failures at Penn State University, particularly the lives of the young victims and their families.

Since November 2011, when the underlying indictments were first announced, the Big Ten Conference Council of Presidents and Chancellors (COPC) committed to a prudent, thoughtful and patient review of the various investigative and adjudicatory processes associated with allegations at Penn State University involving Jerry Sandusky, Joe Paterno, Tim Curley, Gary Schultz and Graham Spanier. In December 2011, Big Ten legal counsel, along with NCAA counsel, engaged in the independent investigation undertaken by Louis Freeh and his law firm, Freeh, Sporkin, & Sullivan, LLP. At that time, the COPC reserved the right to impose sanctions, corrective or other disciplinary measures in this matter in the event that adverse findings were made in the areas of institutional control, ethical conduct and/or other Conference related matters. The COPC also directed the Conference, at that time, to initiate an immediate review of the fundamental issues and systems affecting intercollegiate athletics, including those related to institutional control.

Today, we have read the NCAA release on Penn State University. We note in the release, and have independently confirmed, that Penn State has accepted the factual findings in the July 12, 2012 Report of the Special Investigative Counsel prepared by Louis Freeh and his firm (the Freeh Report). Based on the findings, as accepted by Penn State, we fully support the actions taken by the NCAA. Further, following a thorough review of the Freeh Report, the COPC has voted to impose the following additional sanctions on Penn State, effective immediately:

1. Censure: The accepted findings support the conclusion that our colleagues at Penn State, individuals that we have known and with whom we have worked for many years, have egregiously failed on many levels--morally, ethically and potentially criminally. They have failed their great university, their faculty and staff, their students and alumni, their community and state--and they have failed their fellow member institutions in the Big Ten Conference. For these failures, committed at the highest level of the institution, we hereby condemn this conduct and officially censure Penn State.

2. Probation: The Big Ten Conference will be a party to the Athletic Integrity Agreement referenced in the NCAA release, and will work closely with the NCAA and Penn State to ensure complete compliance with its provisions over the 5 year term of the Agreement.

3. Ineligibility: As referenced in the NCAA release, Penn State's football team will be ineligible for postseason bowl games. It will also be ineligible for Big Ten Conference Championship Games for four years, a period of time that runs concurrently with the NCAA postseason bowl ban imposed this morning.

4. Fine: Because Penn State will be ineligible for bowl games for the next four years, it will therefore be ineligible to receive its share of Big Ten Conference bowl revenues over those same four years. That money, estimated to be approximately $13 million, will be donated to established charitable organizations in Big Ten communities dedicated to the protection of children.

Penn State University is a great institution and has been a valued member of the Big Ten Conference for more than 20 years. Since early November 2011, it has been working very hard to right a terrible wrong. There is more to be done. The intent of the sanctions imposed today is not to destroy a great university, but rather to seek justice and constructively assist a member institution with its efforts to reform. From this day forward, as Penn State continues to make amends, the Big Ten conference and its member institutions will continue to engage with them in every aspect of conference membership.

As a result of the Conference review of issues and systems affecting intercollegiate athletics initiated in December 2011, we recognize that what occurred at Penn State University is a consequence of the concentration of power that can result from a successful athletic program and the failure of institutional leadership to maintain institutional control. We further recognize our own responsibility to insure, within the context of our own institutions, sufficient control and responsibility over our athletic programs. Our review has led to a document entitled Standards and Procedures for Safeguarding Institutional Control of Intercollegiate Athletics that is not yet final, but on schedule to be adopted by the COPC and implemented in the 2012/13 academic year under the auspices and oversight of the COPC."

Comments

The Big Ten? They are demonstrating how petty and vindictive they can be. Penn State did not accept the sanctions...Erickson and the BoTs did. I also find it reprehensible that these sanctimonious members of the "big ten" are already actively recruiting PSU players on campus.

Ellen G. July 25, 2012 at 7:53 pm



The Big Ten? They are demonstrating how petty and vindictive they can be. Penn State did not accept the sanctions...Erickson and the BoTs did. I also find it reprehensible that these sanctimonious members of the "big ten" are already actively recruiting PSU players on campus.

Ellen G. July 25, 2012 at 7:53 pm



Furious that the big ten would jump on the band wagon with the NCAA to hurt the kids for doing nothing and I think you are not putting the punishment where it belongs the leadership at pennstate,NCAA,and the Big Ten should be totally ashamed of themselfs for harming more of our kids instead of doing whats right for them your pushing urself close too the level that started this whole mess and should tuck your tails and hide your know better than some others!!!!

Jamie J. July 23, 2012 at 2:39 pm



IT AINT OVER....FREEH REPORT WILL BE SMASHED.........ARE BEYOND REPROACH Reply Ex-FIFA Presidential Candidate Has Ban Annulled and How It Connects to Penn St. By Frank Wagner (Featured Columnist) on July 19, 2012 2,339reads Use your %u2190 %u2192 (arrow) keys to browse more storiesNext It's not often that the worlds of football and futbol (or soccer, if you would) collide, but today's news may be one of those times. Last year, FIFA (the international governing body of soccer) was preparing for its presidential elections when controversy struck. Just a few weeks away from the election, Qatari Mohammed Bin Hammam, the former president of the Asian Football Confederation and challenger to the widely disliked incumbent FIFA president Sepp Blatter, was accused of corruption. After a quick investigation, Bin Hammam was found to have bribed FIFA's ethics committee with gifts to the tune of $1 million. Bin Hammam was subsequently banned from FIFA for life, leaving the door open for Blatter to win the election unopposed. Does that sound slightly fishy? Well today, the Court of Arbitration of Sport (the highest power in international sporting matters) overturned the ban FIFA had imposed on Bin Hammam and nullified the findings of the investigation into the Qatari (per ESPN). In fact, the court said of the investigation (from Business Week): It is a situation of "case not proven", coupled with concern on the part of the panel that the FIFA investigation was not complete or comprehensive enough to fill the gaps in the record. So what does this have to do with American football, you ask? The connection lies in the investigation into Mohammed Bin Hammam and, moreover, who ran it: former FBI director Louis Freeh. If that name sounds familiar, Freeh is the same man who ran the investigation into Joe Paterno and the Penn State football scandal. In fact, it is Freeh's report that is being treated as the most damning evidence in the case against Paterno's legacy. In it, Freeh says of the case: Our most saddening and sobering finding is the total disregard for the safety and welfare of Sandusky's child victims by the most senior leaders at Penn State. The most powerful men at Penn State failed to take any steps for 14 years to protect the children who Sandusky victimized. Other than Paterno's family, Freeh's report has been treated as unquestionable fact?an understandable reaction. After all, the author's former position in the FBI makes his findings and thoughts fairly reliable. But what about his findings in the Bin Hammam case? What about the fact that the Swiss Court of Arbitration found his investigation of the case to provide "insufficient evidence" to support that same investigation's conclusion? One thing is clear: Whether or not Freeh's findings in the Bin Hammam case were misguided or not does not affect the facts and quality of his report on the Penn State scandal and Joe Paterno's legacy. However, it should probably make the "Freeh Report" at least a little less than unassailable

Sir M. July 23, 2012 at 12:43 pm



Everyone involved, allegedly or otherwise is; 1) deceased, 2) incarcerated, 3) or no longer employed there. And the football program didn't have anything to do with it. People were at fault not the program. There was no massive coverup involving the players, it was their superiors. Punish the leaders or the school, the program was a bystander that got shot. Now you're tearing off the bandages and pouring salt on the wounds. Seperate the crimes when you judge lest you be judged. Hopefully your future will have people judging you as fairly as you have treated people under your jurisdiction.

Robert V. July 23, 2012 at 10:41 am



Everyone involved, allegedly or otherwise is; 1) deceased, 2) incarcerated, 3) or no longer employed there. And the football program didn't have anything to do with it. People were at fault not the program. There was no massive coverup involving the players, it was their superiors. Punish the leaders or the school, the program was a bystander that got shot. Now you're tearing off the bandages and pouring salt on the wounds. Seperate the crimes when you judge lest you be judged. Hopefully your future will have people judging you as fairly as you have treated people under your jurisdiction.

Robert V. July 23, 2012 at 10:40 am

Readers Feel...

hello
Related Content

Student housing issues raising concerns in Huntingdon....

Mark your calendars now for a great day ahead to hit the links and help a great cause....

A Pennsylvania Senator is trying to hit scammers where it hurts, and take their money for a change....

Tim Curley and Gary Schultz have lost another appeal in their perjury trials....

State Police are investigating a pedestrian accident in Huntingdon County....

Father's Day is a time to celebrate Dad and that's exactly what one family did Sunday....

The future of a local nursing home is one step closer to being finalized, but the decision has a lot of people unhappy....

Are we getting more records nowadays, or were the good old days more extreme. We decided to break down what is in the record books. ...

What appears to be an abandoned house in the middle of one small community is causing problems for neighbors and elected officials....

Around 325 former Penn State football players say they support the Paterno family's lawsuit against the NCAA....

 

Joe Amendola, Karl Rominger, Judge Cleland, Tim Curley and more.

View Legal Documents and Transcripts from the Sandusky Trial
 

Click Here to view Sandusky Trial Courtroom Sketches created by Art Lien




Click Here to Read Jerry Sandusky's Bio
 

Drive traffic to your website by embedding Sandusky Trial feed.
 

 
©1998 - 2013 Wearecentralpa.com
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.
All Rights Reserved